At least one natural hazard affects
approximately 19% of the world's landcover and affect over 50% of it's
population (Dilley et al, 2005). These natural hazards often cause damage to
human infrastructure, casualties, economic losses, homelessness, and many other
detrimental effects. Hazard risk assessments currently exist to identify areas
at risk from individual natural hazards. However, many areas of the world are
at risk of more than one hazard type. According to the Hotspots report, over
790 million people are exposed to more than one natural hazard globally (Dilley
et al, 2005).
Multi-hazard risk assessments (MHRA) are used to assess the risk
from more than one hazard affecting an area. The approach used to assess
risk from these individual hazards varies between countries and studies.
Generally, the risk from individual hazards are assessed and the results summed
to calculate the risk from multiple hazards. This is the simplest and least
data demanding method of assessing the risk from multiple hazards. However,
this approach does not account for the connections between hazards.
Hazards are not independent phenomena. They are natural processes,
and as such are complex and affect each other. Often an initial hazard event
will cause or trigger a subsequent natural hazard to occur. This is a cascading
hazard event. The figure below demonstrates some of the existing links between
natural hazards.
Cascading hazards are mentioned in the literature, but descriptions and explanations are rare. Perhaps due to the monodisciplinary of research, cascading hazards have not been investigated to great extent. Natural hazard literature tends to concentrate on specialist, isolated hazards or topics. Little research has been conducted on the broad topic of cascading hazards until recently. The importance of cascading hazard research has been highlighted in recent years because of multi-hazard events of international importance (e.g. Japan earthquake and triggered tsunami, March 2011).
This is very nice to see. Work on cascading or interlinked hazards is the way forward I think in not only developing a better scientific understanding of how hazards occur, but also how to better prepare for them. Look forward to seeing what comes out of your research.
ReplyDeleteBreTT
Thanks for the support! It's nice to see that someone is reading this. I think it's a very interesting new area of research, which is definitely becoming more widely recognised.
Delete